NO, NO, and NO

No to California in SD

California uses Amendment H style primary elections. We don’t need California cost of living, crime, and filth, and government overreach in South Dakota.

No Dark Money

Money for Amendment H came from Colorado and Virginia political organizations that are financed by East Coast billionaires. There are about $1 million is for “consulting fees”.

No to Limited Choice

Amendment H would make it more expensive for people to run for office and would keep some parties from having candidates on the general election ballot.

VOTE NO on AMENDMENT H

NO to California in SD

  • These states have also seen radical-agenda, fringe candidates elected to office after moving to top-two primary elections.

  • Both California and Washington have seen an significant increases in cost of living and crime since they adopted top-two primary elections.

VOTE NO on AMENDMENT H.

NO to Dark Money

  • Amendment H would significantly increase the cost of elections and political campaigns giving more influence to Super PACs and wealthy donors.

  • Money should not determine who wins our elections, the voters should.

  • Big money is using words like “fair” to try to trick us with Amendment H.

Learn how Unite America, a hybrid political action committee that funds Amendment H, uses money to influence elections.

Learn more about the Dark Money.

VOTE NO on AMENDMENT H.

NO to Limiting Voter Choice

  • A top-two system would basically make the primary election a "general election" so the cost of running for office would increase substantially making it very challenging for average people to run for office.

  • It is possible (likely) that two candidates from the same political party would win the primary and face off in the general election. This would mean some parties would never have a candidate in the general election.

VOTE NO on AMENDMENT H.